--Dr. Von Globulous Challenges Frog Historiography with Radical Hooman Origin Theory-- --Esteemed Scientist Stirs Controversy in Frog Community with Claims of Hooman Legacy-- In a groundbreaking revelation that is stirring the waters of the frog world, Dr. Von Globulous, a prominent scientist and historian, has presented a controversial theory that challenges the long-standing beliefs about the origins of frog civilization. His assertion? That the advanced structures and knowledge attributed to the ancestral Bronze Age frogs were, in fact, remnants of a forgotten, intelligent species known as "hoomans." Until now, the common understanding among frogs has been that their ancestors, equipped with rudimentary bronze tools, were the architects of the grand constructions that dot their landscapes, such as the colossal Swamp Francisco Bridge. This belief is deeply ingrained in frog culture and education, forming a significant part of their understanding of their history and capabilities. However, Dr. Von Globulous's research paints a different picture. He posits that these monumental structures and a considerable portion of what frogs consider their inherited knowledge actually originated from the hoomans—a species thought to be long extinct and, until now, regarded in the same light as dinosaurs: mere animals devoid of significant intelligence or culture. "In my extensive studies of the ruins and the artifacts found within, it has become increasingly clear that the level of sophistication required to create such marvels is far beyond the capabilities of Bronze Age frogs," Dr. Von Globulous explained in his recent address at the Annual Herpetological Society Conference. "The intricacy of the architecture, the complexity of the written scripts found in the ruins, and the advanced nature of the giant tools unearthed are all indicative of a civilization far more advanced than previously believed. All our myths are based on giant frog ancestors, but their bones simply cannot be found anywhere. In contrast, giant hooman skeletons are everywhere, and their size matches the ruins and tools." His claims have sent ripples throughout the academic world, with many in the frog community voicing skepticism and even outright disbelief. Critics argue that Dr. Von Globulous's theory not only undermines the accomplishments of their frog ancestors but also challenges the very foundation of their societal narrative. Supporters of the theory, however, find it enlightening. "It's a paradigm shift," says Dr. Lily Croakwell, a colleague of Dr. Von Globulous. "If true, this could mean that much of what we know, from engineering to art, might be inherited from this hooman civilization. It could redefine our understanding of our place in history." Dr. Von Globulous, undeterred by the controversy, continues to advocate for further research. "We owe it to ourselves to explore this possibility. If the hoomans were indeed the progenitors of much of our civilization, then understanding them could be key to understanding our own history and potential." The frog community stands at a crossroads, with this theory presenting more questions than answers. Was the illustrious history of the frogs, as they knew it, a borrowed legacy? Or is Dr. Von Globulous's theory merely a ripple in the pond, destined to fade away against the sturdy beliefs of frog historiography? Only time and further research will tell, but for now, the frog world buzzes with debate and the possibility of a new understanding of their past.